 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Working On Prototype For Offline Spider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wioota.com/2006/08/31/google-working-on-prototype-for-offline-spider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wioota.com/2006/08/31/google-working-on-prototype-for-offline-spider/</link>
	<description>I have nothing to say and I say it.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wioota.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evangelizing Quality</title>
		<link>http://blog.wioota.com/2006/08/31/google-working-on-prototype-for-offline-spider/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>wioota.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evangelizing Quality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 07:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wioota.com/2006/08/31/google-working-on-prototype-for-offline-spider/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] The strategic decision makers often talk to short-term benefits as reasons for taking short-cuts on quality. Sometimes I think the Google Offline Spider&#8217;s Archive maybe handy in settling once and for all how the short term thinking had lead to issues such as poor stickiness or excessive bug reports or that high exit rate from page x. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The strategic decision makers often talk to short-term benefits as reasons for taking short-cuts on quality. Sometimes I think the Google Offline Spider&#8217;s Archive maybe handy in settling once and for all how the short term thinking had lead to issues such as poor stickiness or excessive bug reports or that high exit rate from page x. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
