 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Javascript barriers to rapid development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wioota.com/2007/01/24/javascript-barriers-to-rapid-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wioota.com/2007/01/24/javascript-barriers-to-rapid-development/</link>
	<description>I have nothing to say and I say it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wioota</title>
		<link>http://blog.wioota.com/2007/01/24/javascript-barriers-to-rapid-development/comment-page-1/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>wioota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 04:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wioota.com/2007/01/24/javascript-barriers-to-rapid-development/#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>Script.aculo.us was better than prototype for documentation and I definitely think their approach to drag and drop was easier to get into than YUI. Both libraries suffered from over-simplified examples which I feel may have also been used as the use-cases for implementing the libraries. Our use of YUI for a customisable page ala Google Personalised/MSN Live etc. unearthed issues in their Intersect mode implementation, overlapping target areas and other complexities bound to found in applications which go beyond a simple list or set of drag zones. In these situations the documentation didn&#039;t help but an extra dimension that both libraries do bring to the table is their respective communities which do help close the loop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Script.aculo.us was better than prototype for documentation and I definitely think their approach to drag and drop was easier to get into than YUI. Both libraries suffered from over-simplified examples which I feel may have also been used as the use-cases for implementing the libraries. Our use of YUI for a customisable page ala Google Personalised/MSN Live etc. unearthed issues in their Intersect mode implementation, overlapping target areas and other complexities bound to found in applications which go beyond a simple list or set of drag zones. In these situations the documentation didn&#8217;t help but an extra dimension that both libraries do bring to the table is their respective communities which do help close the loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.wioota.com/2007/01/24/javascript-barriers-to-rapid-development/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wioota.com/2007/01/24/javascript-barriers-to-rapid-development/#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>I am in complete agreement, based on my own experiences (which are actually with Prototype, not YUI, but I&#039;m sure the same reasons stand). I found the complete absence of documentation baffling at first, as the popularity of the library seemed to suggest there was something great about it. There was more documentation (although I should point out it is still not great) for script.aculo.us, which depends on Prototype, than on the prerequisite library itself.

Final pedant point though; you mean &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/allude1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;allude&lt;/a&gt;, not elude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in complete agreement, based on my own experiences (which are actually with Prototype, not YUI, but I&#8217;m sure the same reasons stand). I found the complete absence of documentation baffling at first, as the popularity of the library seemed to suggest there was something great about it. There was more documentation (although I should point out it is still not great) for script.aculo.us, which depends on Prototype, than on the prerequisite library itself.</p>
<p>Final pedant point though; you mean <a href="http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/allude1.html" rel="nofollow">allude</a>, not elude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
